Evaluation+Rubric

= ** Wiki Evaluation Rubric: ** =

** 15-13 ** || Spelling and grammatical errors are rare. The wiki page has structure and is formatted to increase readability. Contains appropriate links, files or images. Image sources are acknowledged and include captions. Images and links are referred to within the text. Headings are added using the heading styles. Wiki features like embedding media, horizontal rules and a table of content are included. Student has a consistent appropriate approach to design and layout. || The page shows insight, depth and understanding. The content, links, files, media and images are relevant and connected to the topic. The content is obviously written by the student and the student has shown a good depth of understanding and knowledge. The page clearly addresses the learning objectives. Information sources are acknowledged in a suitable format. || The page is made by a group of equally engaged students. Each student actively discusses the content of the wiki page. ||
 * = ** Grade **  ||  ** Wiki Authoring (Applying) **  ||  ** Content (Understanding) **  ||  ** Collaboration **  ||
 * = ** A **
 * = ** B **

12-10
|| Few spelling and grammatical errors. Text is clear. The text has structure and the entry flows. Content is arranged in a logical order. The entry contains appropriate links, files or images. Headings are added using the heading styles. Student has a consistent approach to design. || The content has relevant links or images and the links or images may be referred to. The page addresses the learning objectives. Information sources are acknowledged. || Students not equally participated in creating the page. One of the students didn’t contribute to the discussion sufficiently. ||
 * = ** C **

9-7
|| Some spelling and grammatical errors. The wiki page has limited structure or flow. The page may contain links or images. The page is visualized poorly. Student has a mostly consistent approach to design. || Simple page which shows some depth or level of understanding. Entries are short and for the most part relevant to the topic. Some sections of content are cut and paste or show superficial rewriting. The page shows some understanding. The page attempts to address the learning objectives. Information sources are mentioned. || One student dominates. Almost all work is done by only one person. The discussion was not supported by the participants. ||
 * = ** D **

6-1
|| Poor spelling and grammatical errors. Too little or no graphical visualization. Lacks structure or flow. || Simple page which lacks insight, depth or is superficial. Entry is short and frequently irrelevant to the topic. Most sections of content are cut and paste or show superficial rewriting. Language used is not representative of the students’ language. Shows little understanding. || Only one student made the entire work. No discussion takes place. ||

*The rubric was adapted from Andrew Churches’ //Blog Journalling Rubric - Bloom's Digital Taxonomy//, 02/01/09